Is Stanford Medical School Free for Low Income Families

(Natural News) Worried about Omicron? Judge what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave y'all is going to make youMore than likely to go infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to become off in the future and the easier y'all'll make information technology for the virus.

(Article by Steve Kirsch republished from SteveKirsch.Substack.com)

In short, we've been lied to almost the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may go a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to exist negative. In brusk, you lot are getting a short term do good against Delta, but at the expense of a deposition of your overall amnesty to everything else.

These vaccines may assistance you win the war confronting a variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that you brand your amnesty to everything else worse. It's a impaired tradeoff (peculiarly since early treatments piece of work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the science referenced in this commodity, so it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game irresolute tweet about a study in Denmark which instantly went viral equally you can see from the number of retweets:

Holy moly.

This written report shows that after three months the vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer & Moderna against Omicron is actually negative. Pfizer customers are 76.5% more probable and Moderna customers are 39.iii% more likely to be infected than unvaxxed people. https://t.co/wPgAwG8BW3pic.twitter.com/3Oh3IJSVIk

— Ezra Levant ? (@ezralevant) December 23, 2021

I want to tell you what this really ways and how it is being attacked.

Summary: Decline to comply with mandates. At present.

This paper means we will need to inject people every xxx days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune organisation, it'southward probable that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don't get additional as required, they will exist MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'due south what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn't mean the protection wears off (similar we were told). It ways the OPPOSITE of what you were told:it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (past suppressing your immune organisation, probably permanently each time nosotros are injected co-ordinate to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is like a heroin addiction: once you've had a taste of information technology, you lot are hooked: you accept to continue it for life if yous desire protection. If you stop information technology, y'all're a sitting duck for the virus.

What's worse is our government is mandating this now. In lite of this paper, they volition change the vaccine mandates to force you to go vaccinated every month or yous will be fired from your job. Their next motion could well be to make information technology illegal not to exist vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are quickly stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we have no clue what monthly (and later weekly) vaccination will exercise to your body. This has never been tested.

My communication is elementary. If you accept been vaccinated, you need to stop now. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is fond of repeating the old adage, "When you find yourself in a pigsty, end excavation ."

Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals volition not speak out since doing so volition cause them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower cost way to terminate the pandemic

Anybody needs to finish listening to the CDC now and get-go listening to people who accept been saying to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The entire pandemic volition end every bit shortly as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early on treatment protocols which have been available since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was commencement available back and so). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could have (and still can) cease the hospitalization and death with just one affair: early treatment. Merely like Japan has done. But the CDC refused to heed.

What the paper said in item

Outset, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can be found here.

Beginning at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.

Cheque out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on old and new version of the paper):

• And so assume the results yous like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but manus wave confounders at results you don't similar (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Science?
• This is a superb paper, especially the conscientious approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.
• Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness later on that time.This would mean that these vaccines *increase* one'due south chances of infection after the initial 90 days "honeymoon" period.Am I getting this right?If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The central cloth is in the full PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE ways the vaccine is helping the virus, not yous.

So at 60 days, the protection is close to zero, then if you want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune organisation so information technology is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That's not what a vaccine is supposed to exercise.

Furthermore, the negative VE after 90 days means you are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the machinery of action), that nosotros will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you lot get (since it kills off your immune system every time).

Then information technology could very well be monthly boosters after the 2nd dose, weekly boosters subsequently the tertiary dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the fourth dose to maintain your "immunity."

You can't terminate later that because if you cease, you're in worse shape than if yous never started.

The stunning decision of the paper

In calorie-free of the exponential ascension in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are conspicuously drinking the Kool-Assistance on their interpretation of what their written report means.

They also wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it as noted in the italics were my addition):

The negative estimates in the final period arguablysuggest unlike behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This waslikely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections amid young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up call: the vaccines do not piece of work. End repeating the insanity.

Early treatments similar the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "claw you," and they don't cause disability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, nosotros'd accept virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't practice that since medical board will take abroad the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening at present.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are corrupt and incompetent and they volition not concord themselves accountable in an open up argue. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it'due south nothing new. The volume "Prove of damage" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (beingness non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), only any neutral thinking person will side confronting the authorities.

Why the newspaper went viral

And then, the reason this newspaper went viral is considering

1. It is well done,
2. It was done by PhDs in infectious disease and epidemiology,
3. The results show what is really happening, and
4. Nobody has been able to attack the newspaper with a credible argument, even on Twitter.
5. It confirms what my team of experts has been proverb most negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the paper:

The commodity says that it's not peer reviewed and is not published in any scientific journals.

So without verification there are all kinds of claims out there about all kinds of things. Nosotros get by those principles that have passed peer review to split fact and fiction.

— RobertNorton (@robertnorton_) December 23, 2021

It is incommunicable to have a negative VE. You cannot have a negative VE. The absolute everyman VE is zip, which infers no protection whatever. Your statement is completely false, including the data table that isn't even in the study you cited.

— SwingTrader (@SwingTrader1114) December 23, 2021

Supporting evidence

The newspaper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative caption for information technology).

Here'south the data from Canada which shows that nosotros accept it backwards. We should exist mandating "no vaccines" in society to keep your chore and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.

In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita among the vaccinated take skyrocketed higher up cases per capita amidst the unvaccinated.Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this bespeak, because the entire case for restricting vaccinated people is their presumed college per capita infection rate.

Here's the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland data showing the same thing. Nosotros need to flip effectually the mandates ASAP.

It looks like the U.K. data may back up the vaccine-enhanced infection issue both FDA and I take raised.https://t.co/ewFK0ByA4N

— Robert West Malone, Physician (@RWMaloneMD) Dec 22, 2021

Other supporting information:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative office in deaths subsequently vaccination and the video almost that newspaper. If the vaccines don't kill y'all, they will exit you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated after vaccination were institute to have been caused by the vaccines. There is no other explanation.
2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
   An excellent article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the outcome that the more you lot vaccinate, the more you lot make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.
3. Vaccine efficacy declines to exist negative in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland (Betrayal article)
4. Booster protection fades within 10 weeks against Omicron: UK study
5. Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, study finds — which could hateful more than doses for some in 2022
6. This substack article looks at the Danish study (described here) and the UK data. Notation that the VE numbers in the two studies are different because if yous divide our Omicron, you go a very different picture of VE compared to analyses that don't split out VE by variant.
7. Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion EditorialDecember 23, 2021Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-nineteen cases on Th, Dec 23, 2021, setting the province's one-day record for new cases since the outset of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19. Th's numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to four,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks clearly showing that most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Read more at: SteveKirsch.Substack.com

frantzhices1958.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-29-covid-vaccines-damage-your-immune-system.html

Share this post